Battle of Xuzhou preparations begin during the Second Sino Japanese War
January 13, 1938 - Battle of Xuzhou Preparations Begin During the Second Sino Japanese War
By January 13, 1938, you're watching both China and Japan lock onto Xuzhou as the war's next decisive flashpoint — a city whose two crossing railways made it worth more than almost any other position in eastern China. Japan needs its Jin-Pu and Long-Hai rail lines to push deeper into China's interior. China's assembling over 300,000 troops to stop them. What unfolds next reshapes how both sides fight the entire war.
Key Takeaways
- Xuzhou's position at the Jin-Pu and Long-Hai railway crossroads made it a strategically inevitable flashpoint for Japanese forces advancing southward.
- China rapidly assembled roughly 80,000 troops along key rail lines, expanding to 300,000 by mid-February through urgent reinforcements.
- Japan deployed five divisions from North China and three from Central China, executing a coordinated pincer movement toward Xuzhou.
- General Li Zongren commanded China's Fifth War Zone, applying Jiang Baili's protracted warfare doctrine to exhaust advancing Japanese forces.
- Japanese capture of Bengbu on February 9 tightened encirclement north of the Huai River, accelerating pressure on Xuzhou's defenders.
Why Xuzhou Was the Strategic Prize Both Sides Had to Control
Xuzhou sat at the crossroads of two of China's most vital railways—the Jin-Pu line running from Tianjin to Pukou and the Long-Hai line stretching from Lianyungang to Lanzhou. These rail junctions made Xuzhou far more than a provincial city. Whoever controlled them controlled north-south movement between Tianjin and Shanghai while simultaneously commanding east-west supply corridors deep into China's interior.
For Japan, holding Xuzhou meant securing supply lines after Shanghai and Nanjing fell, opening a direct path toward Hankow. For China, defending it carried political symbolism—proof that resistance could hold against a better-equipped enemy. Sitting 600 kilometers south of Beijing, Xuzhou's position made it the inevitable flashpoint where both sides couldn't afford to lose. China assembled 64 divisions and approximately 600,000 troops in Jiangsu Province to counter the Japanese advance toward the city.
The battle unfolded under the overall command of Chinese General Li Zongren, whose Fifth War Zone headquarters coordinated the massive defensive effort across the region. Japan launched its offensive by converging forces from both the north and south, aiming to encircle the city through a two-pronged pincer movement that would cut off any Chinese retreat or reinforcement. Much like the transcontinental railway's role in binding Canada's regions together, control of Xuzhou's strategic rail junction was seen as essential to asserting territorial authority and securing national defense corridors against a powerful adversary.
How China Assembled 300,000 Troops to Defend Xuzhou
By the end of January 1938, China's military conference in Wuchang had declared Xuzhou's defense a top priority, with Chiang Kai-shek personally summoning commanders to hammer out a strategy.
What followed was a massive troop mobilization despite serious logistics challenges and regional politics complicating coordination:
- 80,000 troops initially deployed along JinPu and Longhai rail lines
- 300,000 soldiers assembled by mid-February through rapid reinforcements
- 64 divisions drawn from Shandong, Sichuan, Henan, and Jiangsu
- 450,000–600,000 troops positioned around Xuzhou by late April
You'd see warlord divisions operating under mutual distrust, straining command efficiency.
Yet Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi pushed forward, concentrating forces northeast at Tai'erzhuang to absorb and overextend Japanese attacks. This strategy aligned with Jiang Baili's doctrine of protracted warfare, designed to exhaust Japanese forces across an extended front. Investigations into command breakdowns at Xuzhou later cited poor coordination, inadequate training pipelines, and the absence of unified emergency planning standards as factors that compounded operational vulnerabilities during the campaign.
How Japan Planned to Seize Xuzhou by Controlling Its Rail Lines
Japan's strategy for seizing Xuzhou hinged on controlling its railways, particularly the JinPu line, which intersected with the Longhai railway at Xuzhou itself—making it the critical hub for north-south mobility across central China. Controlling these railway logistics meant connecting key ports like Tianjin, Qingdao, and Shanghai with political centers, enabling a coordinated push into the Central Yangtze valley.
Japan deployed five divisions from North China and three from Central China in a pincer movement. Rather than advancing through mountainous terrain, commanders chose flat routes that functioned as armored corridors, maximizing mechanized unit effectiveness. Air support and heavy artillery overwhelmed defensive positions along the JinPu line by mid-March 1938. Capturing Bengbu on February 9 gave Japan control north of the Huai River, tightening the encirclement around Xuzhou. These campaigns unfolded against the backdrop of Japan's broader occupation of China, which had begun years earlier with the staged railway explosion in Manchuria in 1931 used as a pretext for invasion.
How Tengxian and Linyi Slowed Japan's Advance on Xuzhou
Even as Japan's war machine bore down on Xuzhou from the north, two battles—Tengxian and Linyi—threw its advance into disarray.
At Tengxian, General Wang Mingzhang's poorly armed Sichuanese troops used terrain defense to slow 10,000 Japanese soldiers backed by tanks and artillery.
At Linyi, Pang Bingxun and Zhang Zizhong's forces fought Japan to a bloody stalemate, shattering its invincible reputation.
These delays mattered strategically:
- Tengxian held from March 14–18, buying critical reorganization time
- China's 31st Division reached Tai'erzhuang between March 18–21
- Civilian resistance hardened urban positions against Japanese armor
- Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi consolidated forces 50 km northeast of Xuzhou
Combined, both battles created weeks of delay Japan never recovered from. Xuzhou itself served as the critical junction of the Jinpu and Longhai railways, making its defense a strategic priority for the entire Chinese war effort. The subsequent Battle of Taierzhuang, fought from March 24 to April 7, 1938, delivered one of the first major Japanese setbacks since the war began, dramatically boosting morale across China following the devastating losses at Shanghai and Nanjing.
Taierzhuang: How Xuzhou's Defenders Handed Japan Its First Major Defeat
The battle at Taierzhuang, fought from March 24 to April 7, 1938, turned Japan's string of victories on its head.
You'd see Chinese forces use the city's tight urban terrain to neutralize Japan's firepower advantage, fighting street-to-street, launching night assaults with broad swords, and burning buildings with kerosene to force close-quarter combat.
Guerrilla bands disrupted Japanese supply lines while Russian-supplied reserves bolstered Chinese strength.
By April 5, a Chinese counteroffensive overwhelmed the under-supplied Japanese, routing them by April 7.
The urban resistance proved decisive, annihilating Japan's column and delivering its first major army defeat in decades.
The morale boost rippled across China, with celebrations erupting in Hankou, reigniting national resistance and demonstrating that Japan's soldiers weren't invincible. The defeat triggered a political crisis in Tokyo within weeks, shaking confidence in the military's leadership and strategic judgment.
Why Japan Still Won the Battle of Xuzhou After Taierzhuang
Taierzhuang's victory felt electric, but it couldn't change Japan's broader math. Japan's logistical superiority and sheer troop numbers ultimately secured Xuzhou by May 1938, turning Chinese resistance into political propaganda for morale rather than strategic reversal. The Battle of Taierzhuang in April 1938 marked the first major Chinese Nationalist victory over Japanese forces, briefly shattering the myth of Japanese military invincibility. Much like the Canadian government victory at Batoche in 1885, a single decisive engagement can end organized resistance while leaving deeper political grievances unresolved.
Here's why Japan still prevailed:
- Numerical dominance – Over 150,000 Japanese troops across multiple divisions overwhelmed fragmented Chinese armies.
- Air and artillery control – Complete air superiority sustained bombing campaigns beyond urban combat zones.
- Railway capture achieved – Japan secured Jinpu and Longhai junctions, fulfilling core strategic objectives.
- Chinese retreat preserved survival, not victory – Li Zongren's breakout saved troops but conceded territory.
You can see Taierzhuang as heroic, but Japan captured Xuzhou, enabling its larger Wuhan offensive later that year.
How the Xuzhou Retreat Kept China's Army Alive
Losing Xuzhou didn't mean losing the war. When Chiang Kai-shek ordered the retreat, you'd think surrendering a strategic city spelled disaster. Instead, it saved 200,000–300,000 troops across 40 divisions.
Chinese forces moved with remarkable precision. Nighttime marches kept them hidden from Japanese pursuit, while soldiers sheltered in wheat fields during daylight to avoid aerial detection. A timely sandstorm and fog on May 18 concealed their tracks entirely. Civilian evacuation and logistical improvisation kept the withdrawal functioning under extreme pressure.
General Tang En-po pulled his Thirty-second Army from the Grand Canal banks at midnight on May 17. Troops dispersed into the countryside, preserving China's fighting capacity for the critical Wuhan defense ahead. Japan captured Xuzhou but failed to destroy the army it needed to eliminate. The preserved divisions would contribute to a broader resistance effort, one bolstered by Soviet military aid that continued to supply and strengthen Nationalist forces until 1941. Intelligence operations during this era similarly shaped international rivalries, as seen when Canada expelled 13 Soviet officials following the exposure of an espionage plot targeting the RCMP Security Service in 1978.
Jack Belden, a war correspondent who witnessed the retreat firsthand, reported that the Chinese force was divided into three columns under generals Sun Lien-chung, Tang En-po, and Liao Lei, each tasked with finding gaps in Japanese blockade lines to slip through under cover of darkness.